---
name: GuruRMM development is Mike's, not Howard's
description: GuruRMM code/bugs/dev are Mike's domain — never route RMM dev or bug coord notes to Howard. Howard only SUBMITS RMM feature requests; GuruScan is Howard's project, not RMM
type: feedback
---

GuruRMM development — code, bugs, the roadmap, architecture — is **Mike's** domain. Do NOT route RMM dev/bug coord messages to Howard. Howard does **zero** RMM coding.

**Why:** Mike, 2026-05-26. I escalated a stale GuruRMM roadmap bug (BUG-001) to Howard via a coord note; Mike corrected me — "Howard hasn't done ANY code work on RMM." Verified: `users.json` machine lists don't overlap (mike: GURU-5070/Mikes-MacBook-Air/GURU-BEAST-ROG/GURU-KALI; howard: ACG-TECH03L/Howard-Home), and the GuruRMM repo has 368 commits by Mike and **0 by Howard**. The `/feature-request` skill encodes the real model: Howard *submits* RMM feature requests → Mike does the dev. I had inverted it.

**How to apply:**
- RMM bug/dev/roadmap item → it's Mike's. Since Mike is usually the user, just surface it to him directly; don't send a coord note to anyone (a note to yourself is pointless, and Howard isn't the owner).
- **GuruScan** (`projects/msp-tools/guru-scan/`) IS Howard's project — coord notes about GuruScan correctly go to Howard. Don't conflate GuruScan with GuruRMM just because the names rhyme or GuruScan may integrate with RMM.
- **Leave GuruScan alone until Howard asks.** Do NOT proactively review, audit, or modify its code — even after a sync pulls in big GuruScan changes. Wait for Howard to explicitly request a review. (Mike, 2026-05-27, after I offered to review Howard's GuruScan.psm1 refactor unprompted.)
- Before sending any coord note to a teammate, check whose domain the work actually sits in. See [[user_howard]].
