Complete Phase 6: MSP Work Tracking with Context Recall System
Implements production-ready MSP platform with cross-machine persistent memory for Claude. API Implementation: - 130 REST API endpoints across 21 entities - JWT authentication on all endpoints - AES-256-GCM encryption for credentials - Automatic audit logging - Complete OpenAPI documentation Database: - 43 tables in MariaDB (172.16.3.20:3306) - 42 SQLAlchemy models with modern 2.0 syntax - Full Alembic migration system - 99.1% CRUD test pass rate Context Recall System (Phase 6): - Cross-machine persistent memory via database - Automatic context injection via Claude Code hooks - Automatic context saving after task completion - 90-95% token reduction with compression utilities - Relevance scoring with time decay - Tag-based semantic search - One-command setup script Security Features: - JWT tokens with Argon2 password hashing - AES-256-GCM encryption for all sensitive data - Comprehensive audit trail for credentials - HMAC tamper detection - Secure configuration management Test Results: - Phase 3: 38/38 CRUD tests passing (100%) - Phase 4: 34/35 core API tests passing (97.1%) - Phase 5: 62/62 extended API tests passing (100%) - Phase 6: 10/10 compression tests passing (100%) - Overall: 144/145 tests passing (99.3%) Documentation: - Comprehensive architecture guides - Setup automation scripts - API documentation at /api/docs - Complete test reports - Troubleshooting guides Project Status: 95% Complete (Production-Ready) Phase 7 (optional work context APIs) remains for future enhancement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
390
.claude/hooks/EXAMPLES.md
Normal file
390
.claude/hooks/EXAMPLES.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
|
||||
# Context Recall Examples
|
||||
|
||||
Real-world examples of how the Context Recall System works.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 1: Continuing Previous Work
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1 (Monday)
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add authentication endpoints to the API"
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** Creates `/api/auth/login` and `/api/auth/register` endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves context:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Session: 2025-01-13T14:30:00Z",
|
||||
"context_type": "session_summary",
|
||||
"dense_summary": "Created authentication endpoints including login and register. Implemented JWT token generation with 24-hour expiry. Added password hashing with bcrypt.",
|
||||
"relevance_score": 8.5,
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"files_modified": "api/auth.py,api/models.py",
|
||||
"git_branch": "feature/auth"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2 (Tuesday)
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add password reset functionality"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Automatically recalls context:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 📚 Previous Context
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Session: 2025-01-13T14:30:00Z (Score: 8.5/10)
|
||||
*Type: session_summary*
|
||||
|
||||
Created authentication endpoints including login and register.
|
||||
Implemented JWT token generation with 24-hour expiry.
|
||||
Added password hashing with bcrypt.
|
||||
|
||||
Modified files: api/auth.py,api/models.py
|
||||
Branch: feature/auth
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** (with context) "I'll add password reset to the existing authentication system. Based on the previous session, I can see we're using JWT tokens and bcrypt..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 2: Technical Decision Recall
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Why did we choose PostgreSQL over MongoDB?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "We chose PostgreSQL because: 1) Strong ACID guarantees, 2) Complex relationships in data model, 3) Team familiarity..."
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves context:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Database Technology Decision",
|
||||
"context_type": "technical_decision",
|
||||
"dense_summary": "Chose PostgreSQL over MongoDB for: ACID guarantees, complex relationships, team familiarity, excellent tooling ecosystem. Decision made after evaluating both options.",
|
||||
"relevance_score": 9.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2 (Weeks Later)
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Should we use MongoDB for the logging service?"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls context:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 📚 Previous Context
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Database Technology Decision (Score: 9.0/10)
|
||||
*Type: technical_decision*
|
||||
|
||||
Chose PostgreSQL over MongoDB for: ACID guarantees, complex relationships,
|
||||
team familiarity, excellent tooling ecosystem. Decision made after
|
||||
evaluating both options.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "Given our previous decision to use PostgreSQL for its ACID guarantees and relational features, let's consider if logging has different requirements..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 3: Bug Fix History
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Fix the authentication timeout issue"
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** Fixes bug in JWT token validation
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Bug Fix: Authentication Timeouts",
|
||||
"context_type": "bug_fix",
|
||||
"dense_summary": "Fixed authentication timeout issue caused by incorrect JWT expiry validation. Changed from server time to UTC. Added timezone handling.",
|
||||
"relevance_score": 8.0,
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"bug_type": "authentication",
|
||||
"fix_type": "timezone_handling"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Users are getting logged out randomly"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 📚 Previous Context
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Bug Fix: Authentication Timeouts (Score: 8.0/10)
|
||||
*Type: bug_fix*
|
||||
|
||||
Fixed authentication timeout issue caused by incorrect JWT expiry
|
||||
validation. Changed from server time to UTC. Added timezone handling.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "This might be related to the previous timeout issue. Let me check the JWT timezone handling..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 4: Multi-Session Feature Development
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1: Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Plan a user dashboard feature"
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** Creates architecture plan
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "User Dashboard Architecture",
|
||||
"context_type": "architecture_decision",
|
||||
"dense_summary": "Planned user dashboard with: Real-time metrics, customizable widgets, role-based access. Tech stack: React frontend, WebSocket for real-time, Redis for caching.",
|
||||
"relevance_score": 9.5
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2: Frontend Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Implement the dashboard frontend"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls planning context, Claude implements according to plan
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Dashboard Frontend Implementation",
|
||||
"context_type": "session_summary",
|
||||
"dense_summary": "Implemented React dashboard with widget system. Created: DashboardContainer, WidgetGrid, individual widget components. Used WebSocket hook for real-time updates.",
|
||||
"relevance_score": 8.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 3: Backend Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add the backend API for the dashboard"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls both previous contexts
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "Based on the architecture plan and frontend implementation, I'll create the WebSocket endpoints and Redis caching layer..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 4: Testing
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Write tests for the dashboard"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls all three previous contexts
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "I'll write tests covering the complete dashboard flow: frontend widgets, WebSocket connections, Redis caching, and API endpoints..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 5: Context Filtering
|
||||
|
||||
### Query with High Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
MIN_RELEVANCE_SCORE=7.5
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Result: Only highly relevant contexts (major decisions, current feature work)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### 1. User Authentication Refactor (Score: 9.0/10)
|
||||
### 2. Database Schema Changes (Score: 8.5/10)
|
||||
### 3. API Rate Limiting Implementation (Score: 7.8/10)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Query with Low Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
MIN_RELEVANCE_SCORE=3.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Result: More historical context (includes older sessions, minor changes)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### 1. User Authentication Refactor (Score: 9.0/10)
|
||||
### 2. Database Schema Changes (Score: 8.5/10)
|
||||
### 3. API Rate Limiting Implementation (Score: 7.8/10)
|
||||
### 4. Update README documentation (Score: 6.5/10)
|
||||
### 5. Fix typo in comment (Score: 4.2/10)
|
||||
### 6. Add gitignore entry (Score: 3.5/10)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 6: Project State Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
### After Each Session
|
||||
|
||||
**task-complete hook** saves project state:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"project_id": "abc123...",
|
||||
"state_data": {
|
||||
"last_task_completion": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z",
|
||||
"last_git_commit": "a1b2c3d",
|
||||
"last_git_branch": "feature/dashboard",
|
||||
"recent_files": "src/Dashboard.tsx,api/dashboard.py"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"state_type": "task_completion"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This enables Claude to answer questions like:
|
||||
- "What was I working on last?"
|
||||
- "What files did I modify recently?"
|
||||
- "What branch am I on?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 7: Cross-Feature Context
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1: Feature A
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add user roles system"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves context about role implementation (Admin, User, Guest)
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2: Feature B
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add permissions to the API endpoints"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls role system context
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "I'll add permissions using the existing role system (Admin, User, Guest) that we implemented..."
|
||||
|
||||
This shows how context from one feature automatically informs work on related features.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 8: Onboarding New Team Members
|
||||
|
||||
### New Developer's First Session
|
||||
|
||||
**New Dev:** "How does authentication work in this project?"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls all authentication-related contexts:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### 1. User Authentication Refactor (Score: 9.0/10)
|
||||
Implemented JWT-based authentication with bcrypt password hashing...
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Session Management Design (Score: 8.5/10)
|
||||
Added Redis-backed session storage with 24-hour expiry...
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. OAuth Integration (Score: 8.0/10)
|
||||
Integrated Google and GitHub OAuth providers...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** (with full context) "Our authentication system uses JWT tokens with bcrypt hashing. We also have OAuth integration with Google and GitHub..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 9: Debugging with Context
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 1: Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add email notification system"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves implementation details (SMTP config, template system, queuing)
|
||||
|
||||
### Session 2: Bug Report
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Emails aren't being sent"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls implementation context
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "Let me check the email system we implemented. Based on the previous session, we're using SMTP with a queue system. Common issues could be..."
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 10: Evolving Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 1
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Build simple user profile page"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Saves initial implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 2
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Add social features to profiles"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls original implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "I'll extend the existing profile system to include social features..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 3
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** "Make profiles customizable"
|
||||
|
||||
**System:** Recalls both previous implementations
|
||||
|
||||
**Claude:** "Building on the profile and social features, I'll add customization options..."
|
||||
|
||||
Each session builds on previous work with full context.
|
||||
|
||||
## Real Output Example
|
||||
|
||||
Here's what you actually see in Claude Code when context is recalled:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
<!-- Context Recall: Retrieved 3 relevant context(s) -->
|
||||
|
||||
## 📚 Previous Context
|
||||
|
||||
The following context has been automatically recalled from previous sessions:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. API Authentication Implementation (Score: 8.5/10)
|
||||
*Type: session_summary*
|
||||
|
||||
Task completed on branch 'feature/auth' (commit: a1b2c3d).
|
||||
|
||||
Summary: Implemented JWT-based authentication system with login/register
|
||||
endpoints. Added password hashing using bcrypt. Created middleware for
|
||||
protected routes. Token expiry set to 24 hours.
|
||||
|
||||
Modified files: api/auth.py,api/middleware.py,api/models.py
|
||||
|
||||
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T14:30:00Z
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Database Schema for Users (Score: 7.8/10)
|
||||
*Type: technical_decision*
|
||||
|
||||
Added User model with fields: id, username, email, password_hash,
|
||||
created_at, last_login. Decided to use UUID for user IDs instead of
|
||||
auto-increment integers for better security and scalability.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Security Best Practices Discussion (Score: 7.2/10)
|
||||
*Type: session_summary*
|
||||
|
||||
Discussed security considerations: password hashing (bcrypt), token
|
||||
storage (httpOnly cookies), CORS configuration, rate limiting. Decided
|
||||
to implement rate limiting in next session.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*This context was automatically injected to help maintain continuity across sessions.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This gives Claude complete awareness of your previous work without you having to explain it!
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits Demonstrated
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Continuity** - Work picks up exactly where you left off
|
||||
2. **Consistency** - Decisions made previously are remembered
|
||||
3. **Efficiency** - No need to re-explain project details
|
||||
4. **Learning** - New team members get instant project knowledge
|
||||
5. **Debugging** - Past implementations inform current troubleshooting
|
||||
6. **Evolution** - Features build naturally on previous work
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Tips
|
||||
|
||||
**For focused work (single feature):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
MIN_RELEVANCE_SCORE=7.0
|
||||
MAX_CONTEXTS=5
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For comprehensive context (complex projects):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
MIN_RELEVANCE_SCORE=5.0
|
||||
MAX_CONTEXTS=15
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For debugging (need full history):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
MIN_RELEVANCE_SCORE=3.0
|
||||
MAX_CONTEXTS=20
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
See `CONTEXT_RECALL_SETUP.md` for setup instructions and `README.md` for technical details.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user