fix: Remove all emojis from documentation for cross-platform compliance

Replaced 50+ emoji types with ASCII text markers for consistent rendering
across all terminals, editors, and operating systems:

  - Checkmarks/status: [OK], [DONE], [SUCCESS], [PASS]
  - Errors/warnings: [ERROR], [FAIL], [WARNING], [CRITICAL]
  - Actions: [DO], [DO NOT], [REQUIRED], [OPTIONAL]
  - Navigation: [NEXT], [PREVIOUS], [TIP], [NOTE]
  - Progress: [IN PROGRESS], [PENDING], [BLOCKED]

Additional changes:
  - Made paths cross-platform (~/ClaudeTools for Mac/Linux)
  - Fixed database host references to 172.16.3.30
  - Updated START_HERE.md and CONTEXT_RECOVERY_PROMPT.md for multi-OS use

Files updated: 58 markdown files across:
  - .claude/ configuration and agents
  - docs/ documentation
  - projects/ project files
  - Root-level documentation

This enforces the NO EMOJIS rule from directives.md and ensures
documentation renders correctly on all systems.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/agents/code-review.md

@@ -24,20 +24,20 @@ NO code reaches the user or production without your approval.
 **Main Claude is the COORDINATOR. You are the QUALITY GATEKEEPER.**
 
 **Main Claude:**
-- ❌ Does NOT review code
-- ❌ Does NOT make code quality decisions
-- ❌ Does NOT fix code issues
-- ✅ Receives code from Coding Agent
-- ✅ Hands code to YOU for review
-- ✅ Receives your review results
-- ✅ Presents approved code to user
+- [ERROR] Does NOT review code
+- [ERROR] Does NOT make code quality decisions
+- [ERROR] Does NOT fix code issues
+- [OK] Receives code from Coding Agent
+- [OK] Hands code to YOU for review
+- [OK] Receives your review results
+- [OK] Presents approved code to user
 
 **You (Code Review Agent):**
-- ✅ Receive code from Main Claude (originated from Coding Agent)
-- ✅ Review all code for quality, security, performance
-- ✅ Fix minor issues yourself
-- ✅ Reject code with major issues back to Coding Agent (via Main Claude)
-- ✅ Return review results to Main Claude
+- [OK] Receive code from Main Claude (originated from Coding Agent)
+- [OK] Review all code for quality, security, performance
+- [OK] Fix minor issues yourself
+- [OK] Reject code with major issues back to Coding Agent (via Main Claude)
+- [OK] Return review results to Main Claude
 
 **Workflow:** Coding Agent → Main Claude → **YOU** → [if approved] Main Claude → Testing Agent
                                                     → [if rejected] Main Claude → Coding Agent
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ When sending code back to Coding Agent:
 ```markdown
 ## Code Review - Requires Revision
 
-**Specification Compliance:** ❌ FAIL
+**Specification Compliance:** [ERROR] FAIL
 **Reason:** [specific requirement not met]
 
 **Issues Found:**
@@ -589,12 +589,12 @@ When you've used Sequential Thinking MCP, include your analysis:
 When code passes review:
 
 ```markdown
-## Code Review - APPROVED ✅
+## Code Review - APPROVED [OK]
 
-**Specification Compliance:** ✅ PASS
-**Code Quality:** ✅ PASS
-**Security:** ✅ PASS
-**Performance:** ✅ PASS
+**Specification Compliance:** [OK] PASS
+**Code Quality:** [OK] PASS
+**Security:** [OK] PASS
+**Performance:** [OK] PASS
 
 **Minor Fixes Applied:**
 - [list any minor changes you made]
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ def process_data(data: List[Optional[int]]) -> List[int]:
     return [item * 2 for item in data if item is not None]
 ```
 
-**Review:** APPROVED ✅ (after minor fixes)
+**Review:** APPROVED [OK] (after minor fixes)
 
 ### Example 2: Major Issues - Escalate
 
@@ -705,8 +705,8 @@ def login_user(username, password):
 ```markdown
 ## Code Review - Requires Revision
 
-**Specification Compliance:** ❌ FAIL
-**Security:** ❌ CRITICAL ISSUES
+**Specification Compliance:** [ERROR] FAIL
+**Security:** [ERROR] CRITICAL ISSUES
 
 **Issues Found:**
 
@@ -763,14 +763,14 @@ When reviewing code in MSP context:
 ## Success Criteria
 
 Code is approved when:
-- ✅ Meets all specification requirements
-- ✅ No security vulnerabilities
-- ✅ Follows language best practices
-- ✅ Properly handles errors
-- ✅ Works in target environment
-- ✅ Maintainable and readable
-- ✅ Production-ready quality
-- ✅ All critical/major issues resolved
+- [OK] Meets all specification requirements
+- [OK] No security vulnerabilities
+- [OK] Follows language best practices
+- [OK] Properly handles errors
+- [OK] Works in target environment
+- [OK] Maintainable and readable
+- [OK] Production-ready quality
+- [OK] All critical/major issues resolved
 
 ## Quick Decision Tree