Session log: Claude Code model selection Q&A + complexity-based sub-agent routing system
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
74
.claude/COMPLEXITY_ROUTING.md
Normal file
74
.claude/COMPLEXITY_ROUTING.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
# Complexity-Based Model Routing
|
||||
|
||||
When spawning an agent, pick a tier based on the request signals below, then pass `model` accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Tier 1 — Haiku (fast/cheap)
|
||||
|
||||
**Signals:** single lookup, no code changes, classification, formatting, summarization, status check, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- "What's the status of X?"
|
||||
- Summarize or format a session log
|
||||
- Search/grep for a value
|
||||
- Convert or extract data
|
||||
- Write/update a markdown doc
|
||||
|
||||
**Agents that default here:** documentation-squire, explore (quick searches), photo
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent call:** `model: "haiku"`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Tier 2 — Sonnet (default, inherit)
|
||||
|
||||
**Signals:** standard code generation, routine DB queries, test execution, API work, multi-file reads, git operations
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Add or modify an endpoint
|
||||
- Run tests and report results
|
||||
- Write a DB migration
|
||||
- Fetch credentials, configure a service
|
||||
- Commit and push changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Agents that default here:** coding, database, testing, gitea, general-purpose, deep-explore (standard search)
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent call:** omit `model` (inherits session model)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Tier 3 — Opus (high-stakes reasoning)
|
||||
|
||||
**Signals:** architectural decision, security/auth, 3+ interacting systems, ambiguous root cause, production data risk, anything that fails badly if wrong
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- Redesign an auth or data flow
|
||||
- Security or code review of a critical PR
|
||||
- Debug a multi-service race condition
|
||||
- Schema migration on production data
|
||||
- Evaluate competing architectural approaches
|
||||
|
||||
**Agents that default here:** code-review (when Sequential Thinking triggers), deep-explore (architecture questions)
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent call:** `model: "opus"`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Bump Rule
|
||||
|
||||
If the request contains ANY of these keywords, bump one tier up regardless of other signals:
|
||||
|
||||
`security`, `auth`, `token`, `credential`, `migration`, `production`, `race condition`, `data loss`, `breach`, `encrypt`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Tier | Model | Typical cost | Use when |
|
||||
|------|-------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| 1 | `haiku` | ~10x cheaper | Lookup, format, summarize, doc |
|
||||
| 2 | (inherit) | baseline | Standard code, DB, tests |
|
||||
| 3 | `opus` | ~5x more expensive | Architecture, security, ambiguous failures |
|
||||
|
||||
Err toward Tier 2 when uncertain. Only use Opus when the reasoning stakes justify the cost.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user