sync: auto-sync from GURU-5070 at 2026-06-04 07:07:43
Author: Mike Swanson Machine: GURU-5070 Timestamp: 2026-06-04 07:07:43
This commit is contained in:
65
clients/glaztech/session-logs/2026-06-04-session.md
Normal file
65
clients/glaztech/session-logs/2026-06-04-session.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
# Glaztech — Session Log 2026-06-04
|
||||
|
||||
## User
|
||||
- **User:** Mike Swanson (mike)
|
||||
- **Machine:** GURU-5070
|
||||
- **Role:** admin
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Performed a read-only intrusion / brute-force log review on the Glaztech web server (`WWW`, agent `455a1bc7-1c29-42bc-b597-fa1e64f08eec`, Windows Server 2019, agent v0.6.54) via GuruRMM, following up on the 2026-06-03 website security assessment. Question: is there evidence anyone tried to brute-force the website logins or the server itself.
|
||||
|
||||
Analyzed 7 days of IIS logs (`C:\inetpub\logs\LogFiles\W3SVC4`, ~52,000 requests, May 29 – Jun 4). Identified the two login endpoints (`/customer_login.aspx`, `/emp/employee-login.aspx`), then broke POSTs down per source IP with HTTP status codes. An initial pass flagged the employee portal as suspicious (381 "failures"/HTTP 200 vs 77 "successes"/302 — an inverted ratio vs the customer login). Pulling full per-IP request timelines corrected this: the employee login returns **HTTP 200 on both success and failure** (no redirect-on-success), so status code alone does not indicate a failed staff login. The top "suspect" IP `160.3.157.9` proved to be a single legitimate employee on an iPhone checking timecards. No brute-force or credential-stuffing signature exists on either endpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
Also reviewed the Windows Security event log (4625 failed logons / 4624 successes, 7-day window): only 13 failed logons, all LogonType 3 (SMB) from internal LAN IPs, zero external, no RDP failures, and no successful remote logons from public IPs — indicating RDP/SMB are not internet-exposed and nothing got in at the OS auth layer.
|
||||
|
||||
Folded the findings into the security record: added **Appendix A — Intrusion / Brute-Force Log Review (2026-06-04)** to `clients/glaztech/reports/2026-06-03-website-security-assessment.md`, and extended finding **H5** with a detection-blind-spot note (200-on-both + no lockout + no failed-login logging = slow guessing would be invisible).
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
- **Used IIS request logs as the primary evidence source, not the Windows Security log**, because the app's custom session-based auth never generates Windows logon events. The Security log was used only to rule out RDP/SMB brute force against the host.
|
||||
- **Did not treat HTTP 200 on the employee login as a failure** once the timelines showed 200-on-success. Reported the corrected interpretation rather than the alarming-but-wrong intermediate read.
|
||||
- **Flagged the HTTP 500 bursts** as worth an app-side look (possible SQLi error path per C3) but explicitly classified them as not-a-brute-force, to avoid overstating the threat.
|
||||
- **Recorded the detection gap as the actionable outcome** — the review found no attacker, but confirmed that a slow guessing attack would currently be undetectable; reinforces the existing #32378 remediation (add lockout + failed-login logging).
|
||||
|
||||
## Problems Encountered
|
||||
|
||||
- **`jq -n --arg` heredoc capture glitched** when dispatching the Security-log script (parse error / empty command). Resolved by writing the PowerShell to `.claude/tmp/seclog.ps1` and passing it with `jq --rawfile`, which is robust against embedded quoting.
|
||||
- **IIS logs do not record POST bodies**, so attempted usernames/passwords are not recoverable — noted as a limitation; confirming which accounts (if any) were targeted would require app-level auth logging that does not exist.
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Modified: `clients/glaztech/reports/2026-06-03-website-security-assessment.md` — added Appendix A (2026-06-04 log review); extended H5 with detection-blind-spot note + failed-login-logging fix; updated Status line.
|
||||
- Created: `clients/glaztech/session-logs/2026-06-04-session.md` (this file).
|
||||
- Local-only (gitignored): `.claude/current-mode` set to `infra`; transient `.claude/tmp/seclog.ps1`, `.claude/tmp/rmm.token`, `.claude/tmp/rmm.cmd`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Credentials & Secrets
|
||||
|
||||
- None discovered or created. RMM admin credential read from vault `infrastructure/gururmm-server.sops.yaml` (unchanged).
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure & Servers
|
||||
|
||||
- **WWW** (Glaztech web server) — internal `192.168.8.72`, public `65.113.52.88`, Windows Server 2019 (build 17763), GuruRMM agent `455a1bc7-1c29-42bc-b597-fa1e64f08eec` (v0.6.54), client "Glaztech Industries" / site "TUS - Tucson".
|
||||
- Active IIS site: `W3SVC4` (log dir `C:\inetpub\logs\LogFiles\W3SVC4`; daily `u_exYYMMDD.log`). Older sites W3SVC1/2/3 are stale (last writes 2018–2022).
|
||||
- SQL backend (context only, not touched): `192.168.8.62,3436` (`GTI-INV-SQL`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Commands & Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- IIS analysis dispatched as PowerShell via GuruRMM (`POST /api/agents/<id>/command`), parsing `#Fields`-keyed log lines for `cs-method`, `cs-uri-stem`, `c-ip`, `sc-status`, `date`, `time`, `cs(User-Agent)`.
|
||||
- Key counts: customer login 2,547×302 / 78×200 / 5×500; employee login 77×302 / 381×200 / 6×500; 740 distinct IPs hit the login endpoints; 241 distinct IPs hit the employee login.
|
||||
- Security log: span 2026-03-31 .. 2026-06-04; 4625 in last 7d = 13, all type 3, all internal, usernames = 12 blank + 1 `tomabens`; 4624 external type 3/8/10 = none.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pending / Incomplete Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
- **App-side investigation of the HTTP 500 bursts** on post-login pages (possible SQLi error path) — IPs `201.146.179.166`, `64.178.182.162`, `205.185.107.49`, `172.87.137.60`. Not yet handed to Tom.
|
||||
- **#32378 (Waiting on Customer)** unchanged: add account lockout + failed-login logging (now explicitly tied to this review), fix SQLi, least-privilege the `tom`/`sysadmin` DB login, separate website DB from GTIware, stop storing cards / never CVV, encrypt at rest.
|
||||
- Optional confirming check offered but not run: enumerate listening/forwarded ports on `WWW` to turn "RDP almost certainly not exposed" into "confirmed."
|
||||
- Carried over: `corp` DB `cc_file` "Invalid object name" anomaly; confirm Payrilla payment-flow scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Information
|
||||
|
||||
- Report: `clients/glaztech/reports/2026-06-03-website-security-assessment.md` (Appendix A)
|
||||
- Companion: `clients/glaztech/reports/2026-06-03-pci-cardholder-data-finding.md`
|
||||
- Wiki: `wiki/clients/glaztech.md`
|
||||
- Ticket: Syncro **#32378** (Glaztech website security — Waiting on Customer)
|
||||
- RMM API: `http://172.16.3.30:3001` | agent id `455a1bc7-1c29-42bc-b597-fa1e64f08eec`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user