   168→  },
   169→  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
   170→  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
   171→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   172→      return mockResponse(
   173→        {
   174→          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
   175→          agent_id: id,
   176→          command,
   177→          status: 'completed',
   178→          exit_code: 0,
   179→          stdout: `Executed: \nOutput: Success`,
   180→          stderr: '',
   181→          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   182→          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   183→        },
   184→        1500
   185→      )
   186→    }
   187→    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
   188→  },
   189→  getStats: () => {
   190→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   191→      return mockResponse({
   192→        total: mockAgents.length,

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>

  },
  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: \nOutput: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
  getStats: () => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse({
        total: mockAgents.length,


The perl command removed `${command}` incorrectly. Let me restore and try again more carefully.


Bash

cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm" && git checkout -- dashboard/src/api/client.ts

Restore client.ts from git


Let me write the complete fixed file using a Python script which will be more reliable.


cat > "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/fix-client.py" << 'ENDOFSCRIPT'
import os

file_path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'src/api/client.ts')

with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    content = f.read()

old_code = """  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) =>
    api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command }),
  getStats: () => {"""

new_code = """  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\\nOutput: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
  getStats: () => {"""

if old_code in content:
    content = content.replace(old_code, new_code)
    with open(file_path, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
        f.write(content)
    print('File updated successfully')
else:
    print('Old code not found')
    print('Checking for sendCommand...')
    if 'sendCommand' in content:
        idx = content.find('sendCommand')
        print(f'Found at position {idx}')
        print('Context:', repr(content[idx-30:idx+150]))
ENDOFSCRIPT

Create Python fix script


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard" && python fix-client.py

Run Python fix script


File updated successfully


   168→  },
   169→  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
   170→  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
   171→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   172→      return mockResponse(
   173→        {
   174→          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
   175→          agent_id: id,
   176→          command,
   177→          status: 'completed',
   178→          exit_code: 0,
   179→          stdout: `Executed: ${command}
   180→Output: Success`,
   181→          stderr: '',
   182→          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   183→          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   184→        },
   185→        1500
   186→      )
   187→    }
   188→    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
   189→  },
   190→  getStats: () => {
   191→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   192→      return mockResponse({

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>

  },
  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}
Output: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
  getStats: () => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse({


The display is still showing a newline. Let me check the actual bytes in the file to see if it's correct.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && xxd client.ts | grep -A2 "stdout"

Check hex representation of stdout line


00001240: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 7374 646f 7574            stdout
00001250: 3a20 6045 7865 6375 7465 643a 2024 7b63  : `Executed: ${c
00001260: 6f6d 6d61 6e64 7d0d 0a4f 7574 7075 743a  ommand}..Output:


I see `0d 0a` (CRLF) between `command}` and `Output`. The Python script wrote with a literal newline because the `\\n` inside the raw string was actually two characters `\` and `n`, not an escaped newline. Let me fix this with a more explicit approach.


cat > "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/fix-stdout.py" << 'ENDOFSCRIPT'
import os
import re

file_path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'src/api/client.ts')

with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()

# Look for the pattern with any kind of newline (CRLF or LF)
# Between ${command} and Output
old_pattern = b"stdout: `Executed: ${command}\r\nOutput: Success`"
new_pattern = b"stdout: `Executed: ${command}\\nOutput: Success`"

if old_pattern in content:
    content = content.replace(old_pattern, new_pattern)
    with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
        f.write(content)
    print('Fixed CRLF newline')
else:
    old_pattern_lf = b"stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`"
    if old_pattern_lf in content:
        content = content.replace(old_pattern_lf, new_pattern)
        with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
            f.write(content)
        print('Fixed LF newline')
    else:
        print('Pattern not found')
        # Show what we have
        idx = content.find(b'stdout:')
        if idx != -1:
            print('Current stdout context:', repr(content[idx:idx+60]))
ENDOFSCRIPT

Create binary-mode Python fix script


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard" && python fix-stdout.py

Run binary fix script for stdout


Fixed CRLF newline


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && xxd client.ts | grep -A2 "stdout"

Verify hex representation of fixed stdout


00001240: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 7374 646f 7574            stdout
00001250: 3a20 6045 7865 6375 7465 643a 2024 7b63  : `Executed: ${c
00001260: 6f6d 6d61 6e64 7d0a 4f75 7470 7574 3a20  ommand}.Output:


I can see there's still `0a` (LF) there. The script said it fixed CRLF but there's still a newline. Let me check if the read tool is displaying it oddly. Let me check the raw bytes again more carefully.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && python3 -c "
with open('client.ts', 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()
idx = content.find(b'stdout: ')
print('Around stdout:', repr(content[idx:idx+70]))
"

Check exact bytes around stdout


Around stdout: b"stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,\r\n          stderr: '',"


I see - the script ran but didn't catch the LF-only newline (the script checked for CRLF first and didn't find it because the file now has only LF after my fixes). Let me run the fix again for LF.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard" && python3 -c "
import os

file_path = 'src/api/client.ts'

with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()

old_pattern = b'stdout: \`Executed: \${command}\nOutput: Success\`'
new_pattern = b'stdout: \`Executed: \${command}\\\\nOutput: Success\`'

if old_pattern in content:
    content = content.replace(old_pattern, new_pattern)
    with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
        f.write(content)
    print('Fixed!')
else:
    print('Pattern not found')
    idx = content.find(b'stdout:')
    print('Current:', repr(content[idx:idx+60]))
"

Fix LF newline in stdout


Fixed!


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && python3 -c "
with open('client.ts', 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()
idx = content.find(b'stdout: ')
print('Around stdout:', repr(content[idx:idx+70]))
"

Verify stdout is now correct


Still showing `\n`. Let me check more carefully - the backslash wasn't escaped properly.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard" && python3 << 'EOF'
file_path = 'src/api/client.ts'

with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()

# The literal LF byte (0x0a) between command} and Output
old_pattern = b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\x0aOutput: Success`'
# Replace with backslash-n (two bytes: 0x5c 0x6e)
new_pattern = b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\\nOutput: Success`'

print('Looking for pattern:', repr(old_pattern))
print('Replace with:', repr(new_pattern))

if old_pattern in content:
    content = content.replace(old_pattern, new_pattern)
    with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
        f.write(content)
    print('Fixed!')
else:
    print('Pattern not found')
    idx = content.find(b'stdout:')
    print('Current:', repr(content[idx:idx+60]))
EOF

Fix using hex codes for bytes


Looking for pattern: b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`'
Replace with: b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`'
Fixed!


The output shows both patterns display the same because `\\n` in a bytes literal is interpreted as `\n` (the actual newline). Let me be more explicit.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && python3 -c "
with open('client.ts', 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()
idx = content.find(b'stdout: ')
print('Around stdout:', repr(content[idx:idx+70]))
"

Check stdout bytes


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard" && python3 << 'PYEOF'
file_path = 'src/api/client.ts'

with open(file_path, 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()

# Explicit bytes: backslash is 0x5c, n is 0x6e
backslash_n = bytes([0x5c, 0x6e])  # This is the string literal \n (two characters)
newline = bytes([0x0a])  # This is the actual newline byte

old_pattern = b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}' + newline + b'Output: Success`'
new_pattern = b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}' + backslash_n + b'Output: Success`'

print('Looking for:', repr(old_pattern))
print('Replacing with:', repr(new_pattern))

if old_pattern in content:
    content = content.replace(old_pattern, new_pattern)
    with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
        f.write(content)
    print('Fixed!')
else:
    print('Pattern not found')
PYEOF

Fix using explicit byte arrays


Looking for: b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`'
Replacing with: b'stdout: `Executed: ${command}\\nOutput: Success`'
Fixed!


Now the replacement pattern shows `\\n` which means it's the two-character sequence `\n`. Let me verify.


cd "C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api" && python3 -c "
with open('client.ts', 'rb') as f:
    content = f.read()
idx = content.find(b'stdout: ')
print('Around stdout:', repr(content[idx:idx+70]))
"

Verify stdout is now correct with escaped newline


Around stdout: b"stdout: `Executed: ${command}\\nOutput: Success`,\r\n          stderr: ''"


Now it shows `\\n` which means the file contains the literal characters `\n` (backslash followed by n). Let me verify by reading the file through the normal Read tool.


   168→  },
   169→  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
   170→  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
   171→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   172→      return mockResponse(
   173→        {
   174→          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
   175→          agent_id: id,
   176→          command,
   177→          status: 'completed',
   178→          exit_code: 0,
   179→          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
   180→          stderr: '',
   181→          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   182→          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   183→        },
   184→        1500
   185→      )
   186→    }
   187→    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
   188→  },
   189→  getStats: () => {
   190→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   191→      return mockResponse({
   192→        total: mockAgents.length,

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>

  },
  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
  getStats: () => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse({
        total: mockAgents.length,


The file is now correct. Line 179 shows:
```typescript
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
```

This is exactly what you wanted - the `\n` is now a proper escape sequence within the template literal, not a literal newline.

Let me clean up the helper scripts I created.


Remove temporary fix scripts


Let me verify the complete `sendCommand` function is correct.


   165→      return mockResponse(generateMockMetrics())
   166→    }
   167→    return api.get(`/agents/${id}/metrics`)
   168→  },
   169→  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
   170→  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
   171→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   172→      return mockResponse(
   173→        {
   174→          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
   175→          agent_id: id,
   176→          command,
   177→          status: 'completed',
   178→          exit_code: 0,
   179→          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
   180→          stderr: '',
   181→          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   182→          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
   183→        },
   184→        1500
   185→      )
   186→    }
   187→    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
   188→  },
   189→  getStats: () => {
   190→    if (DEV_MODE) {
   191→      return mockResponse({
   192→        total: mockAgents.length,
   193→        online: mockAgents.filter((a) => a.status === 'online').length,
   194→        offline: mockAgents.filter((a) => a.status === 'offline').length,

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>

      return mockResponse(generateMockMetrics())
    }
    return api.get(`/agents/${id}/metrics`)
  },
  getState: (id: string) => api.get(`/agents/${id}/state`),
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
  getStats: () => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse({
        total: mockAgents.length,
        online: mockAgents.filter((a) => a.status === 'online').length,
        offline: mockAgents.filter((a) => a.status === 'offline').length,


The file is now correctly fixed. The `sendCommand` function (lines 170-188) now:

1. Has proper DEV_MODE mock handling with all fields in the response object
2. Uses single quotes consistently for strings
3. Uses a backtick template string for stdout with `\n` (escaped newline, not a literal newline)
4. Has `return api.post(...)` properly on one line (line 187)
5. Is properly separated from `getStats` with a closing brace, comma, and proper function definition (line 188-189)

The corrected `sendCommand` function at `C:/Users/MikeSwanson/claude-projects/gururmm/guru-rmm/dashboard/src/api/client.ts` lines 170-188:

```typescript
  sendCommand: (id: string, command: string) => {
    if (DEV_MODE) {
      return mockResponse(
        {
          id: 'cmd-' + Date.now(),
          agent_id: id,
          command,
          status: 'completed',
          exit_code: 0,
          stdout: `Executed: ${command}\nOutput: Success`,
          stderr: '',
          created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
          completed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
        },
        1500
      )
    }
    return api.post(`/agents/${id}/command`, { command })
  },
```