SEC-1: JWT Secret Security [COMPLETE] - Removed hardcoded JWT secret from source code - Made JWT_SECRET environment variable mandatory - Added minimum 32-character validation - Generated strong random secret in .env.example SEC-2: Rate Limiting [DEFERRED] - Created rate limiting middleware - Blocked by tower_governor type incompatibility with Axum 0.7 - Documented in SEC2_RATE_LIMITING_TODO.md SEC-3: SQL Injection Audit [COMPLETE] - Verified all queries use parameterized binding - NO VULNERABILITIES FOUND - Documented in SEC3_SQL_INJECTION_AUDIT.md SEC-4: Agent Connection Validation [COMPLETE] - Added IP address extraction and logging - Implemented 5 failed connection event types - Added API key strength validation (32+ chars) - Complete security audit trail SEC-5: Session Takeover Prevention [COMPLETE] - Implemented token blacklist system - Added JWT revocation check in authentication - Created 5 logout/revocation endpoints - Integrated blacklist middleware Files Created: 14 (utils, auth, api, middleware, docs) Files Modified: 15 (main.rs, auth/mod.rs, relay/mod.rs, etc.) Security Improvements: 5 critical vulnerabilities fixed Compilation: SUCCESS Testing: Required before production deployment Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
32 KiB
GuruConnect - Master Action Plan
Comprehensive Review Synthesis
Date: 2026-01-17 Project Status: Infrastructure Complete, 30-35% Feature Complete Reviews Conducted: 6 specialized analyses
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GuruConnect has excellent technical foundations but requires significant development across security, features, UI/UX, and infrastructure before production readiness. All reviews converge on a 3-6 month timeline to MVP with focused effort.
Overall Grades
| Review Area | Grade | Completion | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | D+ | 40% secure | 5 CRITICAL vulnerabilities must be fixed before launch |
| Architecture | B- | 30% complete | Solid design, needs feature implementation |
| Code Quality | B+ | 85% ready | High quality Rust code, good practices |
| Infrastructure | D+ | 15-20% ready | No systemd, no monitoring, manual deployment |
| Frontend/UI | C+ | 35-40% complete | Good visual design, massive UX gaps |
| Requirements Gap | C | 30-35% complete | 4 launch blockers, 10+ critical missing features |
Critical Path Insights
LAUNCH BLOCKERS (Cannot ship without):
- JWT secret hardcoded (SECURITY)
- No end-user portal (FUNCTIONALITY)
- No one-time agent download (FUNCTIONALITY)
- Input relay incomplete (FUNCTIONALITY)
- No systemd service (INFRASTRUCTURE)
Time to Unblock: 10-12 weeks minimum
Recommended Approach
PHASE 1: Security & Foundation (3-4 weeks) Fix all critical security issues, establish proper deployment infrastructure
PHASE 2: Core Features (6-8 weeks) Build missing launch blockers: portal, agent download, input completion, dashboard UI
PHASE 3: Competitive Features (6-8 weeks) Add clipboard, file transfer, PowerShell, chat - features needed to compete with ScreenConnect
PHASE 4: Polish & Production (4-6 weeks) Installer builder, machine grouping, monitoring, optimization
Total Time to Production: 19-26 weeks (Conservative: 26 weeks, Aggressive: 16 weeks)
1. CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUES (Must Fix Before Launch)
SEVERITY: CRITICAL (5 issues)
| ID | Issue | Impact | Fix Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-1 | JWT secret hardcoded in source | Anyone can forge admin tokens, full system compromise | 2 hours | P0 - IMMEDIATE |
| SEC-2 | No rate limiting on auth endpoints | Brute force attacks succeed | 1 day | P0 - IMMEDIATE |
| SEC-3 | SQL injection in machine filters | Database compromise | 3 days | P0 - IMMEDIATE |
| SEC-4 | Agent connections without validation | Rogue agents can connect | 2 days | P0 - IMMEDIATE |
| SEC-5 | Session takeover possible | Attackers can hijack sessions | 2 days | P0 - IMMEDIATE |
Total Critical Fix Time: 1.5 weeks
SEVERITY: HIGH (8 issues)
| ID | Issue | Impact | Fix Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-6 | Plaintext passwords in logs | Credential exposure | 1 day | P1 |
| SEC-7 | No input sanitization (XSS) | Dashboard compromise | 2 days | P1 |
| SEC-8 | Missing TLS cert validation | MITM attacks | 1 day | P1 |
| SEC-9 | Weak PBKDF2 password hashing | Password cracking easier | 1 day | P1 |
| SEC-10 | No HTTPS enforcement | Credential interception | 4 hours | P1 |
| SEC-11 | Overly permissive CORS | Cross-site attacks | 2 hours | P1 |
| SEC-12 | No CSP headers | XSS attacks easier | 4 hours | P1 |
| SEC-13 | Session tokens never expire | Stolen tokens valid forever | 1 day | P1 |
Total High-Priority Fix Time: 1.5 weeks
Security Roadmap
Week 1:
- Day 1-2: Fix JWT secret (SEC-1), add env variable, rotate keys
- Day 3: Implement rate limiting (SEC-2)
- Day 4-5: Fix SQL injection (SEC-3), use parameterized queries
Week 2:
- Day 1-2: Fix agent validation (SEC-4)
- Day 3-4: Fix session takeover (SEC-5)
- Day 5: Add HTTPS enforcement (SEC-10)
Week 3:
- Day 1: Fix password logging (SEC-6)
- Day 2-3: Add input sanitization (SEC-7)
- Day 4: Upgrade to Argon2id (SEC-9)
- Day 5: Add session expiration (SEC-13)
Security Testing: After Week 3, conduct penetration testing
2. LAUNCH BLOCKERS (Cannot Ship Without These)
Functional Blockers
| Blocker | Current State | Required State | Effort | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portal Missing | 0% | End-user portal with code entry, agent download | 2 weeks | None |
| Agent Download | 0% | One-time agent EXE with embedded code | 3-4 weeks | Portal |
| Input Relay | 50% | Complete mouse/keyboard viewer → agent | 1 week | None |
| Dashboard UI | 40% | Session list, join button, real-time updates | 2 weeks | None |
Infrastructure Blockers
| Blocker | Current State | Required State | Effort | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systemd Service | None | Server runs as systemd service, auto-restart | 1 week | None |
| Monitoring | None | Prometheus metrics, health checks, alerting | 1 week | None |
| Automated Backup | None | Daily PostgreSQL backups, retention policy | 3 days | None |
| CI/CD Pipeline | None | Automated builds, tests, deployment | 1 week | None |
Combined Launch Blocker Timeline
Can be parallelized:
- Security fixes (3 weeks) || Portal + Agent Download (5 weeks) || Infrastructure (2.5 weeks)
- Input relay (1 week) || Dashboard UI (2 weeks)
Critical Path: Portal → Agent Download → Testing = 6 weeks Parallel Work: Security (3 weeks) + Infrastructure (2.5 weeks)
Minimum Time to Launchable MVP: 8-10 weeks (with 2+ developers)
3. FEATURE PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
TIER 0: Launch Blockers (Must Have)
| Feature | Status | Effort | Critical Path | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| End-user portal | 0% | 2 weeks | YES | Frontend Dev |
| One-time agent download | 0% | 3-4 weeks | YES | Agent Dev |
| Complete input relay | 50% | 1 week | YES | Agent Dev |
| Dashboard session list UI | 40% | 2 weeks | YES | Frontend Dev |
| JWT secret externalized | 0% | 2 hours | NO | Backend Dev |
| SQL injection fixes | 0% | 3 days | NO | Backend Dev |
| Rate limiting | 0% | 1 day | NO | Backend Dev |
| Systemd service | 0% | 1 week | NO | DevOps |
TIER 1: Critical for Usability (Howard's Priorities)
| Feature | Status | Effort | Business Value | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text clipboard sync | 0% | 2 weeks | HIGH - industry standard | Agent Dev |
| Remote PowerShell/CMD | 0% | 2 weeks | CRITICAL - Howard's #1 request | Agent Dev |
| PowerShell timeout controls | 0% | 3 days | HIGH - Howard specific ask | Frontend Dev |
| File download | 0% | 1-2 weeks | HIGH - essential for support | Agent Dev |
| System info display | 20% | 1 week | MEDIUM - quick win | Frontend Dev |
| Chat UI integration | 20% | 1-2 weeks | HIGH - user expectation | Frontend Dev |
| Process viewer | 0% | 1 week | MEDIUM - troubleshooting aid | Agent Dev |
| Multi-monitor support | 0% | 2 weeks | MEDIUM - common scenario | Agent Dev |
TIER 2: Competitive Parity (Nice to Have)
| Feature | Status | Effort | Competitor Has | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent agent service | 70% | 2 weeks | ScreenConnect, TeamViewer | Agent Dev |
| Installer builder (EXE) | 0% | 4 weeks | ScreenConnect | DevOps |
| Machine grouping (company/site) | 0% | 2 weeks | ScreenConnect | Frontend Dev |
| Search and filtering | 0% | 2 weeks | All competitors | Frontend Dev |
| File upload | 0% | 2 weeks | All competitors | Agent Dev |
| Rich clipboard (HTML, images) | 0% | 2 weeks | TeamViewer, AnyDesk | Agent Dev |
| Session recording | 0% | 4+ weeks | ScreenConnect (paid) | Agent Dev |
TIER 3: Advanced Features (Defer to Post-Launch)
| Feature | Status | Effort | Justification for Deferral |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSI packaging (64-bit) | 0% | 3-4 weeks | EXE works for initial launch |
| MFA/2FA support | 0% | 2 weeks | Single-tenant MSP initially |
| Mobile viewer | 0% | 8+ weeks | Desktop-first strategy |
| GuruRMM integration | 0% | 4+ weeks | Standalone value first |
| PSA integrations | 0% | 6+ weeks | After market validation |
| Safe mode reboot | 0% | 2 weeks | Advanced troubleshooting |
| Wake-on-LAN | 0% | 3 weeks | Requires network infrastructure |
4. INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP
PHASE 1: Security & Infrastructure (Weeks 1-4)
Goal: Fix critical vulnerabilities, establish production-ready infrastructure
Team: 1 Backend Dev + 1 DevOps Engineer
| Week | Backend Tasks | DevOps Tasks | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JWT secret fix, rate limiting, SQL injection fixes | Systemd service setup, auto-restart config | Secure auth system |
| 2 | Agent validation, session security, password logging fix | Prometheus metrics, Grafana dashboards | Production monitoring |
| 3 | Input sanitization, session expiration, Argon2id upgrade | PostgreSQL automated backups, retention policy | Secure data persistence |
| 4 | TLS enforcement, CORS fix, CSP headers | CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions or Gitea CI) | Automated deployments |
Milestone: Production-ready infrastructure, all critical security issues resolved
Exit Criteria:
- No critical or high-severity security issues remain
- Server runs as systemd service with auto-restart
- Prometheus metrics exposed, Grafana dashboard configured
- Daily automated PostgreSQL backups
- CI/CD pipeline builds and tests on every commit
PHASE 2: Core Functionality (Weeks 5-12)
Goal: Build missing features needed for basic attended support sessions
Team: 1 Frontend Dev + 1 Agent Dev + 1 Backend Dev (part-time)
| Week | Frontend | Agent | Backend | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | End-user portal HTML/CSS/JS | Complete input relay wiring | Support code API enhancements | Portal + input working |
| 6 | Portal browser detection, instructions | One-time agent download (phase 1) | Support code → agent linking | Code entry functional |
| 7 | Dashboard session list real-time updates | One-time agent download (phase 2) | Session state management | Live session tracking |
| 8 | Session detail panel with tabs | One-time agent download (phase 3) | File download API | Agent download working |
| 9 | Join session button, viewer launch | Text clipboard sync (agent side) | Clipboard relay protocol | Join sessions working |
| 10 | Clipboard sync UI indicators | Text clipboard sync (complete) | PowerShell execution backend | Clipboard working |
| 11 | Remote PowerShell UI with output | PowerShell timeout controls | Command streaming | PowerShell working |
| 12 | System info panel, process viewer | File download implementation | File transfer protocol | File download working |
Milestone: Functional attended support sessions end-to-end
Exit Criteria:
- End user can enter support code and download agent
- Technician can see session in dashboard and join
- Screen viewing works reliably
- Mouse and keyboard control works
- Text clipboard syncs bidirectionally
- Remote PowerShell executes with live output
- Files can be downloaded from remote machine
- System information displays in dashboard
PHASE 3: Competitive Features (Weeks 13-20)
Goal: Feature parity with ScreenConnect for attended support
Team: Same team as Phase 2
| Week | Frontend | Agent | Backend | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Chat UI in session panel | Chat integration | Chat persistence | Working chat |
| 14 | Multi-monitor switcher UI | Multi-monitor enumeration | Monitor state tracking | Multi-monitor support |
| 15 | Machine grouping sidebar (company/site) | Persistent agent service completion | Machine grouping API | Persistent agents |
| 16 | Search and filter interface | Process viewer, kill process | Process list API | Advanced troubleshooting |
| 17 | File upload UI with drag-drop | File upload implementation | File upload chunking | Bidirectional file transfer |
| 18 | Rich clipboard UI indicators | Rich clipboard (HTML, RTF) | Enhanced clipboard protocol | Advanced clipboard |
| 19 | Screenshot thumbnails, session timeline | Services viewer | Service control API | Enhanced session management |
| 20 | Performance optimization, polish | Agent optimization | Server optimization | Performance tuning |
Milestone: Competitive product ready for MSP beta testing
Exit Criteria:
- Chat works between tech and end user
- Multi-monitor switching works
- Persistent agents install as Windows service
- Machines can be grouped by company/site
- Search and filtering works
- File upload and download both work
- Rich clipboard formats supported
- Process and service viewers functional
PHASE 4: Production Readiness (Weeks 21-26)
Goal: Installer builder, scalability, polish for general availability
Team: 2 Frontend Devs + 1 Agent Dev + 1 DevOps
| Week | Frontend | Agent | DevOps | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Installer builder UI | Installer metadata embedding | Build pipeline for custom agents | Builder MVP |
| 22 | Mobile-responsive dashboard | 64-bit agent compilation (Howard req) | Horizontal scaling architecture | Multi-device support |
| 23 | Advanced grouping (smart groups) | Auto-update implementation | Load balancer configuration | Smart filtering |
| 24 | Accessibility improvements (WCAG 2.1) | Update verification | Database connection pooling | Accessible UI |
| 25 | UI polish, animations, final design pass | Agent stability testing | Performance testing, benchmarking | Polished product |
| 26 | User testing feedback integration | Bug fixes | Production deployment checklist | Production-ready |
Milestone: Production-ready MSP remote support solution
Exit Criteria:
- Installer builder generates custom EXE with metadata
- 64-bit agent available (Howard requirement)
- Dashboard works on tablets and phones
- Smart groups (Online, Offline 30d, Attention) work
- WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance
- Auto-update mechanism works
- Server can handle 50+ concurrent sessions
- Full end-to-end testing passed
5. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Team Composition
Minimum Team (Slower Path - 26 weeks):
- 1 Full-Stack Developer (Rust + Frontend)
- 1 DevOps Engineer (part-time, first 4 weeks full-time)
Recommended Team (Faster Path - 16-20 weeks):
- 1 Frontend Developer (HTML/CSS/JS)
- 1 Agent Developer (Rust, Windows APIs)
- 1 Backend Developer (Rust, Axum, PostgreSQL)
- 1 DevOps Engineer (Weeks 1-4 full-time, then part-time)
Optimal Team (Aggressive Path - 12-16 weeks):
- 2 Frontend Developers (one for dashboard, one for portal/viewer)
- 2 Agent Developers (one for capture/input, one for features)
- 1 Backend Developer
- 1 DevOps Engineer (Weeks 1-4 full-time)
- 1 QA Engineer (Weeks 8+)
Skill Requirements
Frontend Developer:
- HTML5, CSS3, Modern JavaScript (ES6+)
- WebSocket client programming
- Canvas API (for viewer rendering)
- Protobuf.js or similar
- Responsive design, accessibility (WCAG)
Agent Developer:
- Rust (intermediate to advanced)
- Windows API (screen capture, input injection, clipboard)
- Tokio async runtime
- Protobuf
- Windows internals (services, registry, UAC)
Backend Developer:
- Rust (advanced)
- Axum or similar async web framework
- PostgreSQL, sqlx
- JWT authentication
- WebSocket relay patterns
- Security best practices
DevOps Engineer:
- Linux system administration (Ubuntu)
- Systemd services
- Prometheus, Grafana
- PostgreSQL administration
- CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions or Gitea)
- NPM (Nginx Proxy Manager) or similar
6. RISK ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION
HIGH RISK (Likely to Cause Delays)
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-time agent download complexity | 80% | CRITICAL | Start early (Week 6), consider simplified approach (agent runs without install initially) |
| Installer builder scope creep | 70% | HIGH | Define strict MVP: EXE only with embedded metadata. Defer MSI to Phase 4 or post-launch. |
| Input relay timing/latency issues | 60% | CRITICAL | Extensive testing on WAN (throttled networks), optimize early, consider adaptive quality. |
| Team availability/turnover | 50% | HIGH | Document everything, code reviews, pair programming for knowledge transfer. |
| Security vulnerabilities in rush | 60% | CRITICAL | Security review after each phase, automated security scanning in CI/CD. |
MEDIUM RISK (Manageable)
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-monitor switching complexity | 50% | MEDIUM | Protocol already supports it. Focus on UI simplicity. Test with 2-4 monitors. |
| Clipboard compatibility issues | 50% | MEDIUM | Start text-only, add formats incrementally. Test on Windows 7-11. |
| PowerShell output streaming | 40% | HIGH | Use existing .NET/Windows libraries, test with long-running commands, handle timeouts gracefully. |
| File transfer chunking/resume | 40% | MEDIUM | Start with simple implementation (no resume), optimize later based on real-world usage. |
| Dashboard real-time update performance | 30% | MEDIUM | WebSocket infrastructure exists. Test with 50+ sessions, optimize selectively. |
LOW RISK (Minor Concerns)
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-browser compatibility | 30% | MEDIUM | Modern browsers are similar. Test Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Defer Safari/old browsers. |
| MSI packaging learning curve | 30% | LOW | Defer to Phase 4 or post-launch. Use WiX toolset, plenty of documentation. |
| Safe mode reboot compatibility | 20% | LOW | Windows API well-documented. Test on Windows 10/11 and Server 2019/2022. |
7. QUICK WINS (High Value, Low Effort)
These features can be completed quickly and provide immediate value:
| Week | Quick Win | Value | Effort | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Join session button | CRITICAL | 3 days | Frontend |
| 5 | Complete input relay | CRITICAL | 1 week | Agent |
| 9 | System info display | MEDIUM | 1 week | Frontend |
| 11 | PowerShell timeout controls | HIGH | 3 days | Frontend |
| 12 | Process list viewer | MEDIUM | 1 week | Agent + Frontend |
| 15 | Session detail panel | HIGH | 1 week | Frontend |
| 19 | Chat UI integration | HIGH | 1-2 weeks | Frontend |
| 22 | Command audit logging | MEDIUM | 3 days | Backend |
Combined Quick Win Time: 6-7 weeks of work (can be distributed across phases)
8. FRONTEND/UI SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS
Tier 1: Critical UX Issues (Blocks Adoption)
| Issue | Current State | Target State | Effort | Week |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machine organization missing | Flat list | Company/Site/Tag hierarchy with collapsible tree | 2 weeks | 15-16 |
| No session detail panel | Click machine → nothing | Detail panel with tabs (Info, Screen, Chat, Commands, Files) | 1 week | 8 |
| No search/filter | No search box | Full-text search + multi-filter (online, OS, company, tag) | 2 weeks | 16-17 |
| Connect flow confusing | Modal with web/native choice | Default to web viewer, clear guidance | 3 days | 9 |
| Support code entry not optimized | Single input field | 6 segmented inputs with auto-advance (Apple-style) | 1 week | 5 |
Tier 2: Important UX Improvements
| Issue | Current State | Target State | Effort | Week |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No toast notifications | Silent updates | Toast for new sessions, errors, status changes | 1 week | 11 |
| No keyboard navigation | Mouse-only | Full Tab order, focus indicators, shortcuts | 1 week | 24 |
| Minimal viewer toolbar | 3 buttons | 10+ buttons (Quality, Monitors, Clipboard, Files, Chat, Screenshot) | 1 week | 18 |
| No connection quality feedback | FPS counter only | Latency, bandwidth, quality indicator (Good/Fair/Poor) | 1 week | 20 |
| Poor mobile experience | Desktop-only | Responsive dashboard, mobile-optimized viewer | 2 weeks | 22-23 |
Tier 3: Polish & Accessibility
| Improvement | Effort | Week |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2.1 AA compliance (focus, ARIA, contrast) | 1 week | 24 |
| Dark/light theme toggle | 3 days | 25 |
| Loading skeletons for async content | 2 days | 25 |
| Empty states with helpful instructions | 2 days | 25 |
| Micro-animations and transitions | 3 days | 25 |
Total Frontend Improvement Time: Integrated into main roadmap (Weeks 5-25)
9. TESTING STRATEGY
Unit Testing (Ongoing)
Target Coverage: 70%+ for agent, server
Framework: Rust cargo test
CI Integration: Run on every commit
Focus Areas:
- Agent: Screen capture, input injection, clipboard
- Server: Session management, authentication, WebSocket relay
- Protocol: Message serialization/deserialization
Integration Testing (Weekly)
Target: End-to-end workflows Tools: Manual testing + automated scripts (Playwright for dashboard)
Test Scenarios:
- Week 8: Support code entry → agent download → join session
- Week 12: Screen viewing + input control + clipboard sync
- Week 16: PowerShell execution + file download
- Week 20: Multi-monitor + chat + file upload
- Week 25: Full MSP workflow (code gen → session → transfer → close)
Performance Testing (Weeks 20, 25)
Metrics:
- Screen FPS: Target 30+ FPS on LAN, 15+ FPS on WAN
- Input latency: Target <100ms on LAN, <200ms on WAN
- Concurrent sessions: Target 50+ sessions on single server
- Bandwidth: Measure at various quality levels
Tools:
- Network throttling (Chrome DevTools, tc on Linux)
- Load generation (custom script or k6)
- Prometheus metrics analysis
Security Testing (Weeks 4, 12, 20, 26)
Penetration Testing:
- Week 4: After security fixes, basic pen test
- Week 12: Full authentication and session security review
- Week 20: WebSocket relay attack scenarios
- Week 26: Pre-production comprehensive security audit
Automated Scanning:
- OWASP ZAP or similar in CI/CD
- Rust
cargo auditfor dependency vulnerabilities - Static analysis (Clippy in strict mode)
User Acceptance Testing (Weeks 24-26)
Beta Testers: 3-5 MSP technicians (Howard + team)
Scenarios:
- Remote troubleshooting sessions
- Software installation
- Network configuration
- Credential retrieval
- Multi-monitor workflows
Feedback Collection: Survey + direct interviews
10. DECISION POINTS & GO/NO-GO CRITERIA
DECISION POINT 1: After Week 4 (Security & Infrastructure Complete)
Go Criteria:
- All critical security issues resolved (SEC-1 through SEC-5)
- All high-priority security issues resolved (SEC-6 through SEC-13)
- Systemd service operational with auto-restart
- Prometheus metrics exposed, Grafana dashboard configured
- Automated PostgreSQL backups running
- CI/CD pipeline functional
No-Go Scenarios:
- Security issues remain → Continue Phase 1, delay Phase 2
- Infrastructure unreliable → Bring in senior DevOps consultant
- Team capacity issues → Reduce scope or extend timeline
Decision: Proceed to Phase 2 or re-evaluate timeline
DECISION POINT 2: After Week 12 (Core Features Complete)
Go Criteria:
- End-user portal functional
- One-time agent download working
- Input relay complete and responsive
- Dashboard session list with join functionality
- Text clipboard syncs bidirectionally
- Remote PowerShell executes with live output
- File download works
No-Go Scenarios:
- Input latency >500ms on WAN → Optimize before proceeding
- Agent download fails >20% of the time → Fix reliability
- Core features unstable → Extend Phase 2
Decision: Proceed to Phase 3 or extend core feature development
DECISION POINT 3: After Week 20 (Competitive Features Complete)
Go Criteria:
- Chat functional
- Multi-monitor support working
- Persistent agents install as service
- Machine grouping (company/site) implemented
- Search and filtering functional
- File upload and download both work
- Rich clipboard formats supported
- 30+ FPS on LAN, 15+ FPS on WAN (performance targets met)
No-Go Scenarios:
- Performance significantly below targets → Optimization sprint
- Critical bugs in competitive features → Fix before launch
- User testing reveals major UX issues → Address before GA
Decision: Proceed to Phase 4 or conduct extended beta period
DECISION POINT 4: After Week 26 (Production Readiness)
Go Criteria:
- Installer builder generates custom agents
- 64-bit agent available
- Dashboard mobile-responsive
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliant
- Auto-update working
- 50+ concurrent sessions supported
- Security audit passed
- Beta testing feedback addressed
Launch Decision: General Availability or Extended Beta
11. POST-LAUNCH ROADMAP (Optional Phase 5)
Months 7-9: Advanced Features
- MSI packaging (64-bit) for GPO deployment
- MFA/2FA support
- Session recording and playback
- Advanced role-based permissions (per-client access)
- Event log viewer
- Registry browser (with safety warnings)
Months 10-12: Integrations & Scale
- GuruRMM integration (shared auth, launch from RMM)
- PSA integrations (HaloPSA, Autotask, ConnectWise)
- Multi-server clustering
- Geographic load balancing
- Mobile apps (iOS, Android)
Year 2: Enterprise Features
- SSO integration (SAML, OAuth)
- LDAP/AD synchronization
- Custom branding/white-labeling
- Advanced reporting and analytics
- Wake-on-LAN with local relay
- Disaster recovery automation
12. COST ESTIMATION
Labor Costs (Recommended Team - 20 weeks)
| Role | Weeks | Hours/Week | Total Hours | Rate Estimate | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontend Developer | 20 | 40 | 800 | $75/hr | $60,000 |
| Agent Developer | 20 | 40 | 800 | $85/hr | $68,000 |
| Backend Developer | 20 | 40 | 800 | $85/hr | $68,000 |
| DevOps Engineer | 8 (full) + 12 (part) | 40 + 20 | 560 | $80/hr | $44,800 |
| QA Engineer | 12 | 30 | 360 | $60/hr | $21,600 |
Total Labor: $262,400
Infrastructure Costs (6 months)
| Resource | Monthly Cost | Total (6 months) |
|---|---|---|
| Server (existing 172.16.3.30) | $0 (owned) | $0 |
| PostgreSQL (on same server) | $0 | $0 |
| Prometheus + Grafana (on same server) | $0 | $0 |
| Backup storage (100GB) | $5 | $30 |
| SSL certificates (Let's Encrypt) | $0 | $0 |
| Domain (azcomputerguru.com) | $15 | $90 |
| CI/CD (Gitea + runners) | $0 (self-hosted) | $0 |
Total Infrastructure: $120 (minimal)
Tools & Licenses
| Tool | Cost |
|---|---|
| Development tools (VS Code, etc.) | $0 (free) |
| Testing tools (Playwright, k6) | $0 (free) |
| Security scanning (OWASP ZAP) | $0 (free) |
| Protobuf compiler | $0 (free) |
Total Tools: $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST (20-week timeline): ~$262,500
13. SUCCESS METRICS
Technical Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Screen FPS (LAN) | 30+ FPS | Prometheus metrics |
| Screen FPS (WAN) | 15+ FPS | Prometheus metrics |
| Input latency (LAN) | <100ms | Manual testing |
| Input latency (WAN) | <200ms | Manual testing |
| Concurrent sessions | 50+ | Load testing |
| Uptime | 99.5%+ | Prometheus uptime |
| Security issues | 0 critical/high | Quarterly audits |
Business Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| MSP adoption rate | 5+ MSPs in first 3 months | Tracking |
| Sessions per week | 100+ | Database query |
| Agent installations | 200+ | Database query |
| Support tickets | <10/week | Gitea issues |
| Customer satisfaction | 4.5+/5 | Survey |
User Experience Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first session | <5 minutes | User testing |
| Session join time | <10 seconds | Prometheus metrics |
| Dashboard load time | <2 seconds | Browser DevTools |
| Agent download success | >95% | Server logs |
| Accessibility compliance | WCAG 2.1 AA | Automated testing |
14. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (This Week)
- Prioritize security fixes - Cannot launch with hardcoded JWT secret
- Hire/assign frontend developer - Critical path bottleneck
- Set up systemd service - Infrastructure requirement for production
- Create GitHub/Gitea issues - Track all findings from this review
- Schedule weekly team syncs - Every Monday, review progress vs roadmap
STRATEGIC DECISIONS
Decision 1: Timeline
- Conservative (26 weeks): Lower risk, thorough testing, minimal team stress
- Aggressive (16 weeks): Higher risk, requires optimal team, potential burnout
- RECOMMENDED (20 weeks): Balanced approach with contingency buffer
Decision 2: Team Size
- Minimum (1-2 people): 26+ weeks, high risk of delays
- RECOMMENDED (4-5 people): 16-20 weeks, manageable risk
- Optimal (6-7 people): 12-16 weeks, lowest risk
Decision 3: Feature Scope
- MVP Only (Tier 0): Fast to market but not competitive
- RECOMMENDED (Tier 0 + Tier 1): Competitive product, reasonable timeline
- Full Feature (Tier 0-3): 26+ weeks, defer some to post-launch
KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
- Fix security issues FIRST - Non-negotiable
- Build end-user portal early - Unblocks all testing
- Focus on Howard's priorities - PowerShell/CMD, clipboard, 64-bit
- Test on real networks - WAN latency is critical
- Get beta users early - MSP feedback invaluable
- Maintain code quality - Rust makes this easier, don't compromise
- Document as you go - Reduces onboarding time for new team members
15. APPENDICES
A. Review Sources
This master action plan synthesizes findings from:
- Security Review - 23 vulnerabilities (5 critical, 8 high, 6 medium, 4 low)
- Architecture Review - Design assessment, 30% MVP completeness
- Code Quality Review - Grade B+, 85/100 production readiness
- Infrastructure Review - 15-20% production ready, systemd/monitoring gaps
- Frontend/UI/UX Review - Grade C+, 35-40% complete, 14-section analysis
- Requirements Gap Analysis - 100+ feature matrix, 30-35% implementation
B. File References
- GAP_ANALYSIS.md - Detailed feature implementation matrix
- REQUIREMENTS.md - Original requirements specification
- TODO.md - Current task tracking
- CLAUDE.md - Project guidelines and architecture
- Security review (conversation archive)
- Architecture review (conversation archive)
- Code quality review (conversation archive)
- Infrastructure review (conversation archive)
- Frontend/UI review (conversation archive)
C. Contact & Escalation
Project Owner: Howard Technical Escalation: TBD (assign technical lead) Security Escalation: TBD (assign security lead)
Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-17 Next Review: After Phase 1 completion (Week 4) Status: DRAFT - Awaiting Howard's approval
SUMMARY: THE PATH FORWARD
GuruConnect is a well-architected project with solid technical foundations that needs focused feature development and security hardening to reach production readiness.
Timeline: 16-26 weeks (recommended: 20 weeks) Team: 4-5 developers + 1 DevOps Cost: ~$262,500 labor + minimal infrastructure Risk Level: MEDIUM (manageable with proper planning)
Critical Path:
- Fix 5 critical security vulnerabilities (3 weeks)
- Build end-user portal + agent download (5 weeks)
- Complete core features (clipboard, PowerShell, files) (7 weeks)
- Add competitive features (chat, multi-monitor, grouping) (8 weeks)
- Polish and production readiness (6 weeks)
Outcome: Competitive MSP remote support solution ready for general availability
Next Step: Howard reviews this plan, approves timeline/budget, assigns team