Root cause of the DSCA39 footer mismatch: the "Standard output load for test is 250 ohms." line is a footer note, not a parameter, but the STAGE 1 extractor captured it as a (column-truncated) row "Standard output load for te". And the renderer's OUTSIGTYPE==='CURRENT' emission was wrong on both ends — it printed the note (after the underline, invisible to the validator gate) for many -C current models whose staged originals never had it, and never placed it correctly for the models that do. Fix is data-driven, matching the rest of the template approach: - derive-dsca-templates.js: detect the "Standard output load..." line, capture it as a per-model `loadNote` property, and exclude it from rows. Regenerated dsca-templates.json — surgically clean: only the 5 DSCA39 models changed (lost the truncated row, gained loadNote); all 121 others byte-identical. - datasheet-exact.js: emit `dscaTpl.loadNote` (blank line + note) before the footer underline, only for models that have it; removed the OUTSIGTYPE-based emission. STAGE 3 re-validation: FINAL-TEST CLEAN 85 -> 88, mismatches 9 -> 6, matches 2206 -> 2278. DSCA39-01/02/07 now fully clean; DSCA39-01 byte-content-verified. No regression — the -C current models stayed clean and no longer carry the spurious after-underline note. The 6 remaining dirty models (DSCA38-05/-1793/-19C/-19E, DSCA39-05, DSCA39-1950) are ALL retest data-vintage: the staged .TXT is an older test run than the DB latest-wins record (Supply Current / Linearity differ by more than rounding). Not render bugs — cannot be reconciled against an older sheet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.8 KiB
3.8 KiB